Petition under section 265-K_Cr-P-C.
Purpose: to hunt final judgment of associate defendant from the criminal case that is subjudice before the court.
IN THE
COURT OF ADDL: SESSION COURT, RAWALPINDI
(Name, parentage, and address of accused/petitioner) ……Petitioner
Versus
The State ……Respondent
PETITION U/S 265-K Cr-P.C.
IN CASE VIDE FIR NO. 649, DATED 20.12.2013, U/S 302/324, 148/149 PPC, P.S
ALIPUR CHATTA.
Respectfully
Sheweth,
That the petitioner isn't appointive in the FIR and there's
no specific role had been attributed to the petitioner, shortly the bottom of
supplementary statement recorded by the plaintiff cheekbone fidely and
factitiously with the connivance of the police roped within the on top of the aforementioned
case to the petitioner.
That at the same time as per the contents of the supplementary
statement narrated by the plaintiff the clear there's no case created against
the current petitioner there's no specific role attributed to the current
petitioner within the aforementioned supplementary statement of the plaintiff.
That during the course of investigation no any incriminating
material or any recovery was affected from the possession of the petitioner,
therefore there's no any connecting martial, inculpatory material or any
evidence is in possession of the petitioner to attach the petitioner with the
on top of the aforementioned charge.
That the compromise of the petitioner has been affected with
the legal heirs of deceased Safi Ullah Khan and as per the statement of the
legal heirs of the aforementioned deceased that they don’t need to proceed with
the aforementioned case against the current petitioner and 3 others and
additionally unconditionally recorded their statement before this Hon’ble court
that they need to forgive the petitioner and 3 others within the name of
Almighty Supreme Being and additionally waived the correct of Diyat. They
additionally expressed that if the petitioner is not guilty by this Hon’ble
court, they need no objection.
That there's no proof in possession of prosecution charge is
idle and groundless and specifically, the charge is compoundable and therefore
the compromise has been effected between the parties. In these things, to
proceed with the case against the petitioner can amount to pre-trial path
conviction to the petitioner likewise as can amount to mere wastage the
preciouses time of this Hon’ble court and is additionally abuse method of the law.
That within the lightweight aforementioned state of affairs
there's no chance of conviction of the petitioner.
That petitioner has a blotless career and he’s neither involved negative alternative case nor a previous convict. The petitioner belongs to a Nobel and respectable family.
PRAYER
In view of the above cited, it's most humbly prayed that by considering the petition in hand and taking into consideration the actual fact that the charge against the petitioner is groundless and the offense is compoundable and the compromise also has been affected, therefore there's no chance of conviction of the petitioner, hence the petitioner may kindly be acquitted from the case in hand, within the interest of justice.
Petitioners Through Counsel
0 Comments