Intra-court-appeal (I.C.A) |
IN
THE HON’BLE (NAME _____) HIGH COURT
I.C.A No. _________/202_IN W.P.No. 01/2019
In the matter of:
(Name, parentage, and address of the
appellant/s) …..Appellant
Versus
(Name, parentage, and address of the
respondent/s) …Respondents
INTRA
COURT APPEAL (I.C.A) AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 01.01.2020 OF THIS HON’BLE COURT,
WHEREBY THE WRIT PETITION FILED BY THE APPELLANT HAS BEEN DISMISSED IN LIMINE
Respectfully Sheweth,
That transient fact of the moment Intra
Court -appeal area unit that the appellant filed a judicial writ petition U/A
199 scan with Article 2-A, 3, 25 & 38 of the Constitution of monotheism Republic of Islamic
Republic of Pakistan, 1973 before this Hon’ble court with the averments that
the appellant was at the start recruited as civilian on twenty six.12.1997.
when completion of the requisite service, the appellant got retired on 26.12.1998.
In pursuance of a billboard revealed in the elected press within the year 1999 whereby
posts in government sectors were offered to the general public, the appellant
consideredan himself to be eligible candidate and applied for an identical post. He was
recruited on 01.01.1998 within the aforesaid force and with the gradual
promotion, he was finally promoted as Major on thirty.05.2008 and remained post
in the department. when rendering service for the amount of eight years, 9 months, and twenty-eight days, the appellant reached at the age of superannuation and
was retired on fifteen.03.200 by the manner of unleashin order issued by the
respondents while not grant pensionary advantages also as while not
investigation previous service of the appellant.
That the notices were issued to the
respondents and also the respondents submitted their comments so as to resist
the claim of the appellant.
That after, the learned single bench of
this Hon’ble court, was happy to dismiss the judicial writ petition of the
current appellant in limine vide order dated 01.01.2020 hence, this Intra Court
-appeal (ICA) on the subsequent amongst other:-
G
R O U N D S
That the impugned order dated 01.01.2020
is against facts, law, and the principle of natural justice.
That the appellant served with devotion
over twenty years and gained unconditional right to be forbidden fairly and
equitably. underneath laws his former service warrants counted for pension in
Forces, wherever from attaining the age of superannuation he was finally retired.
The pertinent deficiency vis-a-vis requisite investigation has been
condoned/rectified by authority; competent thus, additional steps have
additionally been confiscated. No dearth in compliance with Rules, therefore, is
obtainable and no justification is maintained to deny the rights envisaged.
That within the term of Regulation No.
22(d) of the Pension laws, Volume-1 (Forces), 2012 the appellant was entitled
to the pensionary advantages, whereas considering his previous service
rendered in the department and during this regard, the appellant additionally submitted
a declaration as was needed underneath the laws ibid for investigation of his
former service however the learned
single bench whereas attending to its impugned finding of fact, has neglected
the dear rights of the appellant that area unit concerned within the matter.
That Hon’ble High Courts area unit is meant
to safeguard the constitutional rights of the voters of the Islamic Republic of
Pakistan against discretionary and malafide acts of the chief and dispense
justice within the society at any value. it's for the most part recognized
principle of natural justice ‘Fiat justitia ruat coelum’, ‘let justice be done if the Heavens fall’. within the
circumstances, the impugned order of the Hon’ble single bench is against the scope
of natural justice, contradictory to varied pronouncements of the Hon’ble apex
courts, and offensive of constitutional mandate, therefore, ita isn't property within
the eyes of the law and is vulnerable to put aside.
That the impugned order is a result of
material illegalities and irregularities culminating in gross miscarriage of
justice.
That the impugned order relies on surmises
and conjectures.
That the impugned order is the result of
misinterpretation and non-reading.
That the considerable rights of the
appellant are concerned in the instant matter and if the current -appeal isn't
allowed and also the impugned order isn't put aside, then the appellant shall
suffer an irreparable loss.
That the learned single bench didn't
hassle to gauge the rights of the appellant and passed the impugned order in slipshod
manner.
That whereas passing the impugned order,
the learned court didn't examine the material facts within the file.
That the order impugned order is not within
the jurisdiction and the learned single bench passed the impugned order without
its jurisdiction.
PRAYER:
In view of the above circumstances, it's
most with all respect prayed that instant intra court -appeal (I.C.A) may
kindly be accepted and also the order dated 01.01.2020 of Single Bench of this
Hon’ble court, in a writ petition No. 3075/2018 might gracefully be declared illegal,
unlawful, null and void upon the rights of the appellant, and same might
gracefully be put aside, in the interest of justice.
Any other relief that this Hon’ble court
deems match and correct can also be granted.
Appellant Through Counsel
Certificate:
It is certified that as per info received
by the appellant, this is 1st intra-court -appeal, ever filed before this
Hon’ble court.
It is alos certified that there's no
different petition or appeal is decided or pending up till the Hon’ble Supreme
Court of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan.
Counsel
1 Comments
it's really helpful for us thanks.
ReplyDelete